Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- log [2026/03/31 15:13] – [[Retrospect] 6th Meeting (2026-03-31)] team1
+++ log [2026/04/23 11:01] (current) – [[Retrospect] 7th Presentation Meeting (2026-04-23)] team1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ======Logbook======
+/*
 //This is your logbook. Insert here all relevant information regarding the evolution of your project//
+*/
 ===== Weekly Report =====
 ==== 1st Week Report ====
@@ Line 32: / Line 34: @@
 ==== 4th Week Report ====
 What went well:
-  * The team prepared a proper presentation and finished most of our deliverables on time.
+  * The team prepared a proper presentation and finished most of the deliverables on time.
 What went not so well:
@@ Line 61: / Line 63: @@
     * Additionally, use this principle in the idea formulation chapter
 ==== 5th Week Report ====
+**30/03/2026**
+Presentation on case study of ethical business scandal for communications class was prepared and presented.
 **31/03/2026**
 Team improved the way of presenting together, feedback from ma-com presentation preparing for the Interim.
+**01/04/2026:**
+After a meeting with the teachers, the team concluded the following:
+  * There's no uniformity in number and unit usage. When using a number and a unit, there must always be a space in between.
+  * Basil doesn't need light but users might want to grow other plants. The team must consider a lighting system.
+  * The schematic deliverable and the list of materials & components need to be revised. If help is needed, the team can contact the professor (LUL)
+  * The SWOT analysis needs to be corrected. Threats are external phenomena, so related to users and the area. Weaknesses are internal, like component failure.
+  * The team is mixing the words pod and pot in the report, only one can remain.
+==== 6th Week Report ====
 ===== Meetings =====
@@ Line 131: / Line 144: @@
 === Minute: ===
+This week, the focus is on writing the background section with proper citations, using the wiki as the main reference source, and including ethics and competitor pricing. The project should prioritize sustainability, affordability, and human-centered design, with attention to energy use and materials.
+The concept involves a vertical hydroponic system with plants and fish, supported by a smart control system (new black box diagram). Key decisions include the level of automation and alignment with the target user group. The app will feature automation, user guidance, notifications, and a teaching function, while also encouraging community interaction and outdoor engagement.
+Design should incorporate natural, locally sourced materials, with a compact structure and integrated screen. All choices must support sustainability and ethical standards. Proofreading and typo checks are required.
 ==== [Retrospect] 4th Meeting (NO MEETING) (2026-03-19) ====
@@ Line 202: / Line 221: @@
 If we want to 3D-print the prototype, we have to provide drawings for this. But also we need to write about the real material used in the product that we are selling.
-==== [Retrospect] 6th Meeting  (2026-03-31) ====
+==== [Retrospect] 6th Meeting  (2026-04-01) ====
 === Agenda: ===
@@ Line 214: / Line 233: @@
 . Fixed black-box diagram
+==== [Retrospect] Interim Presentation  (2026-04-16) ====
+==== [Retrospect] 7th Presentation Meeting (2026-04-23) ====
+=== Agenda ===
+. Presentation ⇒ update on our project.
+. Introduction to our App
+. 3D-Model
+. Plan for the upcoming week
+==== Minutes (2026-04-23) ====
+May 15th there is deadline to submit scientific paper. We need to deliver list of materials, all schematics and 3D model before students week, so Teachers can order parts for us. We need to write to Kristina and discuss and decide on final choice of beans (soil). In the leaflet we need to provide dimensions of each part of the pot. 3D model video should be self-explanatory with captions, ex. water reservoir capacity is 1 liter. Suggestion is that during final presentation we can add small plant in the pot growing during presentation. Development of the art  - suggestion, when presenting software from top to bottom, first overall description
+Write for somebody who its familiar with the topics - start with overall view - main ideas - how focus session works.
@@ Line 230: / Line 271: @@
 |23.03.26|25.03.26|Cardboard prototype|Drawings of the product showing the inital idea|Ymke|
 |19.03.26|21.03.26|Organize Jira|Reorganize Jira using the correct hierarchy|Avkaran|
+|05.04.26|07.04.26|App research|Research similar apps for design, functionality and performance purposes|Avkaran|
+|08.04.26|09.04.26|App design|Make high-fidelity wireframe of app|Avkaran|
+|09.04.26|09.04.26|User testing|User test the wireframe|Avkaran|
+|12.04.26|12.04.26|Pre-interim team meeting|The team held a meeting to prepare for the final tasks before uploading the interim deliverables|Entire team|
+|15.04.26|16.04.26|Interim rehearsal|The team physically came together to rehearse the interim presentation and timing it|Entire team|
+|16.04.26|16.04.26|Interim presentation|Present our product idea at the interim presentations|Entire team|